dotinthesky: (Default)
Dot in the Sky ([personal profile] dotinthesky) wrote2012-01-29 04:06 pm

Sob Story

Oliver TwistOliver Twist by Charles Dickens

My rating: 2 of 5 stars

I heard a critic once compare Stephen King and Jackie Collins to Charles Dickens. This critic wondered which of today's current popular authors would survive the centuries and still be read in the future. I didn't understand the comparison at the time because in my mind Jackie and Stephen appeal to people who want a quick thrill without the danger of having to think too hard. I thought Dickens' novels were classic because there was more to them than their soap opera plot lines. But this was before I read my first Charles Dickens novel - this one.

The sentimentality in this novel is so sickly sweet that it's very hard for a modern reader to sympathise with Oliver or any of the other heroes. All the children in the story, including Oliver, are little men in thoughts, words and looks - even down to the original illustrations by George Cruikshank. This is more believable in the Artful Dodger and his gang because they live very adult lives as thieves on London's streets, but with Oliver it comes across as a pleading, whiny, goody goody personality that grates.

My boyfriend pointed out how all productions of Oliver Twist throughout the years have tried to invest some humanity into Fagin, some light. There's none of that in the original creation - he's a repellent villain with no redeeming features. But does that mean that Dickens was antisemitic? Some of the Christian characters are evil too (especially the ones entrusted with orphan children) but at least they are counterbalanced by the goodhearted ones that save Oliver. The Jews that work with Fagin though are just as evil as him, which is a problem in the novel I think.

Dickens used Oliver Twist to raise public awareness of exploited children in his time and even went on to defend the creation of asylums for prostitutes (thus the reason for Nancy's existence in the novel.) I've also heard that Dickens loved walking around London and it was through these walks that he conjured his stories. This comes through beautifully in the novel and is its saving grace - the city's riches and poverty are perfectly captured by his prose.

View all my reviews

[identity profile] millionreasons.livejournal.com 2012-01-30 11:33 am (UTC)(link)
I was going to read this next.... Maybe try The Pickwick Papers if you want a lighter Dickens?

[identity profile] commonpeople.livejournal.com 2012-01-30 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think I'll be reading Dickens for a while. Maybe in his tricentenary? I wouldn't bother with Twist if I were you - stick to the films or BBC adaptations!

[identity profile] bella1978.livejournal.com 2012-01-30 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I can't claim to have read this book, but did you happen to watch the programme Sebastian Faulks on Fiction? I think it was on BBC 3 or 4 a while back. He suggested the boys weren't just pick pockets they were probably rent boys too. It seemed so obvious when he said it. As you say, he was writing about exploited children and Victorian London could be a very dark, sinister place.

[identity profile] commonpeople.livejournal.com 2012-01-30 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't watch it - will see if I can find it on the iPlayer. I think Faulks read too much into it, tbh. Yes, that element is there for Nancy, but it's really not hinted at for the boys. Sure, that was probably what those boys did in real London, but I think even that was a bit too scandalous and taboo for Dickens to breach at the time.