Before King Arthur
Jul. 14th, 2012 04:19 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

My rating: 4 of 5 stars
I first read Lyonesse as a teenager and immediately fell in love with it. Sure, there were some minor plot holes - especially as the story moved through the trilogy of the same name - but its overall charm won in the end. Then, a few years later in university, I tried reading it again and thought it was a terrible misogynistic creation - to the point where I took the whole trilogy to a nearby charity shop and gave it away.
Seventeen years later and I was tempted to revisit the series again and find out why I'd loved it in the first place, and if the misogyny was really so bad. What I discovered was a world firmly in the mold of Angela Carter's fairy tales - the bite and sting from fairies and trolls casually sitting beside the evil committed by kings and queens. Not only that but some of Chaucer's ribaldry too. Stories definitely not meant for children. It's been a reminder for me of how important it is to revisit loved books: the stories never remain the same - we see them through different eyes as we grow older.
G.R.R. Martin took, no doubt, a lot of inspiration from Lyonesse for his A Song of Ice and Fire series - the geography of both worlds is similar as well as its intrigues, horrors, tragic love stories and magic. Lyonesse, however, is an expansion on the Arthurian legend which gives Vance more scope to play with motifs such as early Christianity (one of the biggest horrors in the book is the building of a chapel in a beautiful and remote garden.) G.R.R. Martin must have also taken note of the major plot twist in this novel that takes all readers by surprise which raises the novel above others in the fantasy genre.
View all my reviews
no subject
on 2012-07-14 04:14 pm (UTC)Did you find the misogyny as bad on your latest reading then?
no subject
on 2012-07-14 04:23 pm (UTC)It's not so much misogyny I see now but some uncomfortable scenes involving an ogre and children, in particular pre-pubescent girls. But, to be honest, it's not as bad as G.R.R. Martin can get, and because the context is fairy tales I found it easier to handle. Looking around at some reviews, that's really the worse side that has made some readers give up on the book (including my younger self.)
no subject
on 2012-07-14 07:34 pm (UTC)If I ever find time to read again.. ;-)
no subject
on 2012-07-14 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2012-07-15 09:01 am (UTC)Have you read the "Cugel the Clever" stories -- they're really strange and unusual.
What did you think in the end about misogyny or otherwise. I think I tend to be quite forgiving of books which are (a) set in a period where that would be real and (b) written a long time ago anyway.
no subject
on 2012-07-15 09:26 am (UTC)In the end, I thought the misogyny had the context you mentioned - especially when considering it was based on fairy tales. In a way I think Vance is poking fun on the fantasy and fairy tale genres - making them more "adult" in the same manner as Angela Carter.
no subject
on 2012-07-15 01:06 pm (UTC)Tales of the Dying Earth collects 4 collections of Dying Earth stories by Jack Vance and should be easily available.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Dying-Earth-Fantasy-Masterworks/dp/1857989945/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1342357520&sr=8-1
no subject
on 2012-07-15 01:34 pm (UTC)